Showing posts with label United Nations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Nations. Show all posts

Satellite images confirm Syrian temple destruction: U.N

Satellite images have confirmed the destruction of a Roman-era temple in the Syrian city of Palmyra, a United Nations agency said, after the hardline Islamic State group claimed responsibility for blowing up the structure a week ago.

Islamic State detonated explosives in the ancient Baal Shamin temple on Aug. 25, an act that cultural agency UNESCO has called a war crime aimed at wiping out a symbol of Syria's diverse cultural heritage.

An analysis of an image taken in June and others taken several days ago show the obliteration of the temple in the central desert city, the Geneva-based United Nations Institute for Training and Research said in a statement.

"We confirm the destruction of the main building, while surrounding columns seem to be less affected."

Activists have said Islamic State is tightly controlling communications in the city, making its reports of events difficult to verify independently.

Islamic State has proclaimed a caliphate to rule over all Muslims from territory it holds in both Syria and Iraq. It has often carried out mass killings in places it captures and demolishes monuments it considers sacrilegious.

Islamic State published a photo report of the destruction on Tuesday. The group also beheaded Khaled al-Asaad, an 82-year-old Syrian archaeologist who had looked after Palmyra's ruins for four decades, and hung his body in public, according to Syria's antiquities chief.

The group seized the desert city of Palmyra in May from government forces but initially left its historical sites unharmed.

(Reporting by Sylvia Westall; Editing by Ruth Pitchford)

Report/ Retures

Obama: Netanyahu's Palestine stance erodes Israel's credibility

U.S. President Barack Obama said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's terms for diplomacy that might lead to a Palestinian state meant Israel had lost international credibility as a potential peacemaker.

Obama also suggested that continued U.S. diplomatic defense for Israel at the United Nations over the Palestine dispute may be reviewed, while reaffirming U.S. support for Israeli security in a conflict-riven Middle East.

In an interview with Israeli television aired on Tuesday, he offered a bleak outlook for decades of negotiations on Palestinian statehood bearing any fruit during the 18 months he has left in office.

"I don't see the likelihood of a framework agreement," Obama said in an interview with Uvda, a current-affairs program produced by Israel's top-rated Channel Two and Keshet television. "The question is how do we create some building blocks of trust and progress."

While Obama has acknowledged the geographical and ideological divisions among Palestinians that have bedeviled peace efforts, in the interview -- taped in the White House on Friday -- he focused on Netanyahu's policies.

On the eve of his March 17 election to a fourth term, Netanyahu said there would be no Palestinian state if he remained premier. He argued that any withdrawals from occupied territory by Israel would embolden hardline Islamist guerrillas arrayed on its borders.

Netanyahu has since sought to row back from those remarks but his peace overtures have met with scepticism from the Palestinians as well as Western diplomats.

Obama said Netanyahu's position "has so many caveats, so many conditions that it is not realistic to think that those conditions would be met at any time in the near future.

"So the danger is that Israel as a whole loses credibility. Already, the international community does not believe that Israel is serious about a two-state solution."

The last round of U.S.-sponsored talks stalled more than a year ago, with Palestinians blaming Israeli settlement-building in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, among the territories where they seek an independent state.

Obama said now was the time for a re-evaluation of "how we approach defending Israel on the international stage around the Palestinian issue".

He cited pro-Palestinian resolutions at the United Nations that Washington has long blocked in the name of encouraging direct diplomacy between the sides. Asked whether such U.S. vetoes would continue, Obama sounded circumspect.

"Well, here's the challenge. If in fact there is no prospect of an actual peace process, if nobody believes there is a peace process, then it becomes more difficult to argue with those who are concerned about settlement construction, those who are concerned about the current situation," he said.

"It is more difficult for me to say to them, 'Be patient, wait, because we have a process here.'"

Israelis and Palestinians both, Obama said, should work with the United States to "move off what appears right now to be a hopeless situation and move it back toward a hopeful situation". He did not offer more concrete solutions.

Netanyahu's office did not immediately comment on the Obama interview. Speaking at an Israeli missile defense drill earlier on Tuesday, Netanyahu stressed the need for self-sufficiency: "When it comes to Israel's security, I rely, first of all, on ourselves."

(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

U.N. Secretary General troubled by Iraq abuse claims, refugees

(GNN) - U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said on Monday he was concerned about alleged abuses by Iraqi pro-government forces in their war against Islamic State and called for investigations into any wrongdoing.

Ban's remarks, made during a one-day visit to Iraq, amounted to the strongest warning to date by a world leader regarding the suspected conduct of some of the Shi'ite paramilitaries battling Sunni Muslim Islamic State fighters.


Speaking alongside Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi, Ban called for the different "volunteer armed groups" -- a broad term referring to Shi'ite paramilitary factions -- to be brought under government control.

"I am ... concerned by allegations of summary killings, abductions and destruction of property perpetrated by forces and militias fighting alongside Iraqi armed forces," Ban said after meeting Iraqi officials.

"Alleged violations or abuses of human rights must be investigated and perpetrators need to be held to account."

Ban said actions committed by Islamic State against Iraq's Shi'ite majority and religious minorities, including massacres of soldiers and executions of civilians, did not justify any similar action by the pro-government fighters.

"Civilians freed from the brutality of Daesh should not have to then fear their liberators," Ban said, using the Arabic acronym for Islamic State.

"One form of violence cannot replace another," he added, alluding to reports of abuse against ordinary Sunnis when their areas were freed from Islamic State.

The Shi'ite armed factions, who have been leading the fight against Sunni jihadists since the near collapse of the Iraqi army last summer, have denied accusations of abuse.

Islamic State, which wishes to erect a medieval-style caliphate across the Middle East, seized nearly all of Iraq's Sunni territories in 2014.

Ban told reporters he was concerned that neither Baghdad nor international organizations could take care of the more than 2.5 million Iraqis displaced by the continuing conflict.

"The threat of additional and secondary displacement during ongoing military operations may overwhelm local and international capacities," he said.

Abadi, who spoke before Ban, said anyone who committed human rights violations should be brought to court.

A moderate Shi'ite Islamist, Abadi came to power after Islamic State's military rise last summer. He said that, while the majority of crimes were carried out by Islamic State, some abuses had been committed by those fighting the Sunni jihadists.

He said most of those cases had happened last summer as Islamic State swept across central Iraq, and people feared for their lives. "Our commitment to human rights is final and definite," Abadi said.

Sunni civilians complain rights abuses continue to the present day.

After his visit to Iraq, Ban is due to travel to Kuwait for a conference on Syrian refugees.

(Reuters)(Reporting by Ned Parker; Editing by Crispian Balmer)

Houthi leader says Yemen faces Libya-style strife

(GNN) - The leader of Yemen's powerful Houthi movement vowed on Sunday to pursue Islamist militants behind suicide attacks anywhere and said the country was in danger of descending into Libya-style strife.

In a live televised speech, Abdel-Malek al-Houthi said his decisison to mobilise his fighters amid accelerating violence in recent days was aimed against Islamic State, which claimed responsibility for bombings that killed more than 130 in the capital Sanaa on Friday, and against al Qaeda.

He also criticised the U.N. Security Council, saying it was led by countries that ploted "evil" against others. (Reuters)(Reporting by Sami Aboudi and Amena Bakr, Writing by William Maclean)

Slow start revives doubts about Congo campaign against Rwandan rebels

(GNN) - The government soldiers manning an outpost high above the town of Kashuga have a panoramic view of the hills and valleys of eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, home to hundreds of Rwandan Hutu rebels their government has promised to crush.

But three weeks after Congo's army launched an offensive against the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), the outpost's commander has received no orders to attack the rebel group.

Just a few hundred meters away across the Mweso River are the hills where the rebels - whose 1,400 fighters include the remnants of militia involved in Rwanda's 1994 genocide -

have their hideouts, local people say.

"There is no war," said the commander of the hill-top camp, a huddle of tents where soldiers drift around aimlessly. "Here, near us, there are no operations."

The faltering start to the highly-anticipated campaign in North Kivu province has revived doubts about the will and capacity of Congo's army to defeat a group at the heart of two decades of conflict in Africa’s Great Lakes region.

Many analysts believe that defeating the FDLR is critical to breaking a catastrophic cycle of violence in eastern Congo, whose rich deposits of gold, tin and tantalum and vast ungoverned spaces have invited meddling by its more powerful neighbors.

Since fleeing into eastern Congo after the genocide, FDLR gunmen have waged periodic war with the government and other armed groups. Their presence on Congolese soil has served as pretext for a series of military interventions by Rwanda.

The rebels portray themselves as defenders of Hutu refugees in Congo and say they wish to return to Rwanda through a negotiated settlement with Kigali. The U.N. peacekeeping mission in Congo (MONUSCO) says that their covert purpose appears to be the overthrow of the Rwandan government.

Millions died of conflict, hunger and disease during a 1998 to 2003 war in Congo, fueled by Rwandan intervention, and the region remains plagued by dozens of armed militias.

Previous campaigns against the FDLR, including operations in 2009 backed by Rwandan and U.N. forces, weakened but failed to dismantle the group.

  

TOWNS RECAPTURED

The army commander in eastern Congo, General Leon Mushale, says it has recovered more than two dozen towns since late February. He said about 182 FDLR fighters have either surrendered, been killed or captured.

Yet farmers along the road to Kashuga said the FDLR acts with impunity, descending on their fields in gangs of up to 50 to extort food and transport. The army, meanwhile, has announced the capture of only one senior rebel leader.

The slow progress has reinforced doubts among many analysts about the government’s will to take on the group. Reports by U.N. panels of experts have documented commercial ties between FARDC elements and the FDLR. The two forces have also collaborated in the past against Rwandan-backed rebels.

The Enough Project, an advocacy group, has estimated that the FDLR earns more than $30 million a year from the illicit charcoal trade. The group is also involved in the smuggling of gold and other minerals and receives financing from overseas networks, according to the U.N. experts.

"Senior members of the security establishment have not been entirely cooperative – let’s put it that way – with the operations and still maintain contacts with FDLR leadership," said Jason Stearns, director of the Congo Research Group at New York University and a former U.N. expert in Congo.

Fidel Bafilemba, a researcher for Enough in the lakeside capital of North Kivu province, Goma, said the FDLR is politically useful for Congo President Joseph Kabila.

"The policy is to keep the FDLR as long as possible in eastern Congo because if it's gone Kabila himself will no longer have an alibi to not provide the basics to his people – water, education, food, security," he said.

Kabila came to power in 2001 following the assassination of his father and went on to win disputed elections in 2006 and 2011.

He is barred by the constitution from standing for a third elected term in an election scheduled for next year, but critics suspect him of seeking to prolong his time in office, provoking violent protests in January that killed at least 40 people.

The Rwandan-backed M23 rebellion, which waged an insurrection for two years before reaching a peace agreement with the government in 2013, previously posed the biggest security threat in the east.

During the conflict, the U.N. Group of Experts documented low-level collaboration between the Congolese army and FDLR.

BOOTS ON THE GROUND

Logistical challenges could also be slowing progress in the current campaign. The army is fighting without the support of MONUSCO after a row over suspected rights abuses by two Congolese commanders led the United Nations to suspend involvement.

U.N. officials said their logistical support, ranging from millions of pounds of rations to thousands of gallons of fuel, is crucial.

"The Congolese have pushed the FDLR back out of certain areas," a senior U.N. Security Council diplomat said. "But in the absence of MONUSCO support are they going to be able to sustain it for more than a couple of weeks?”

The army insists it has adequate provisions and attributes the slow pace on the ground to the challenges of fighting an enemy deeply embedded in local communities.

But a police officer said soldiers operating in Rutshuru territory were being forced to pull back from combat zones to larger towns at night for lack of supplies, leaving the population vulnerable to reprisals by the rebels.

"In the past, there have been (logistical) improvements, but I think there are still concerns that they’re not fully able to support their troops in the field," said Daniel Fahey, who served as coordinator of the U.N. panel of experts last year.

With the FDLR’s fighters mostly avoiding combat and instead retreating deeper into eastern Congo’s dense forests, the army says it is methodically squeezing the enemy.

One army source, who asked not to be named, said that when his unit assaulted a refugee camp in northern Masisi this month, FDLR fighters hid among the civilian population.

"The fighters fled first, then their families," he said. "We couldn’t attack their families so we just left a few observers behind."

The limited operation thus far has spared the region the humanitarian crisis witnessed during the 2009 offensives, which displaced around a million people.

Rwanda, which has cited the threat of the Hutu rebels to justify a series of incursions into Congolese territory and railed against delays in launching the latest operation earlier this year, has remained mostly silent since fighting began late last month.

But some residents fear the tepid campaign might leave them in the worst possible situation – facing an angry and vengeful, but not substantially weakened, FDLR.

In Mweso, where the senior FDLR commander was arrested, many locals said that they were facing blowback, including pillaging and threats over alleged collaboration with the army.

Theopil Bahati, a resident, said he welcomed the operations but had learned from past experience not to get his hopes up: “I don’t think this will be the end of the FDLR.”

(Reuters)(Additional reporting by Michelle Nichols in New York; Editing by Daniel Flynn and Angus MacSwan)

Houthis seize strategic Yemeni city, escalating power struggle

(GNN) - Houthi fighters opposed to Yemen's president took over the central city of Taiz in an escalation of a power struggle diplomats say risks drawing in neighboring oil giant Saudi Arabia and its main regional rival Iran.

Abdel-Malek al-Houthi, head of the powerful Shi'ite Muslim group, vowed to pursue Sunni militants behind suicide attacks on Houthi supporters and said the poor Arabian peninsula country was in danger of descending into Libya-style turmoil.

In a live televised speech, Abdel-Malek al-Houthi said his decision to mobilize fighters amid accelerating violence in recent days was aimed against Islamic State, which claimed responsibility for bombings that killed more than 130 in the capital Sanaa on Friday, and against al Qaeda.

Conflict has been spreading across Yemen since last year when the Houthis seized the capital Sanaa and effectively removed President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, who now seeks a comeback from his base in Aden.

Residents of Taiz, on a main road from the capital Sanaa to the country's second city of Aden, said that Houthi militias took over the city's military airport without a struggle from local authorities late on Saturday.

Eyewitnesses in the central province of Ibb reported seeing dozens of tanks and military vehicles headed southward from Houthi-controlled areas toward Taiz, while activists in the city said Houthi gunmen shot into the air to disperse protests by residents demonstrating against their presence.

The advance of the Iranian-backed group has angered Sunni Gulf Arab states led by Saudi Arabia.

The Houthi expansion into mostly Sunni areas in the center and west has led to months of clashes with local tribes and al Qaeda, raising fears that the heavily armed country might descend into civil war.

INTERVENTION

Iran on Sunday called for dialogue, but suggested that Hadi should leave to spare the country further bloodshed.

"The expectation is that President ... Hadi will resign rather than repeat mistakes, to play a constructive role in preventing the break-up of Yemen and the transformation of Aden into a terrorist haven," said Iran's deputy foreign minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian, according to state news agency IRNA.
But Gulf Arab leaders and security officials on Saturday said Hadi was Yemen's legitimate ruler and they were ready to make "all efforts" to defend the country's security.

"Yemen is sliding into a dark tunnel which would have serious consequences not only on Yemen but on security and stability in the region," the officials, who included Saudi Interior Minister Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, said.

"The security of Yemen and of the GCC countries is an indivisible whole," it added.

ESCALATING VIOLENCE

Yemen's struggle for power intensified on Thursday, when loyalists and opponents of Hadi fought gun battles in Aden.

On Sunday, anti-aircraft guns opened fire at an unidentified plane flying over Hadi's compound in Aden, witnesses said, in the third incident of its kind since last Thursday.

U.S. officials said Washington had evacuated its remaining personnel from Yemen, including around 100 special operations forces, because of worsening security, marking a setback in U.S. efforts against a powerful al Qaeda branch.

The Houthis are allied with former president Ali Abdullah Saleh, still influential in the military despite having given up power in 2011 after mass protests against his rule. The Yemeni army has varied loyalties, with most units being controlled by the Houthis or Saleh, while some are loyal to Hadi.

In his speech, Houthi criticized the U.N. Security Council, saying it was led by countries plotting "evil" against others.

Houthi did not elaborate. But diplomats in New York said the council would on Sunday condemn the takeover of much of Yemen and its institutions by the Shi'ite Muslim Houthis and warn of "further measures" if hostilities do not end.

Houthi also accused Saudi Arabia and Qatar - two among several Gulf Arab states opposed to the Houthis' rise to power -- of fomenting "destruction" inside and outside of the region.

He added that unidentified foes had encouraged militant violence and used political reform talks to buy time, something he said would eventually transfer "the Libyan example to Yemen ... This has become more apparent and clear than ever."

(Reuters)(Additional reporting by Sami Aboudi, Noah Browning, Mohammed Ghobari, Angus McDowall and Sam Wilkin; Writing by William Maclean,; Editing by Louise Heavens and Stephen Powell)

Houthi chief vows to fight militants, sees Libya-style strife

(GNN) - The leader of Yemen's powerful Houthi movement vowed on Sunday to pursue Islamist militants behind suicide attacks anywhere and said the country was in danger of descending into Libya-style turmoil.

In a live televised speech, Abdel-Malek al-Houthi said his decision to mobilize his fighters amid accelerating violence in recent days was aimed against Islamic State, which claimed responsibility for bombings that killed more than 130 in the capital Sanaa on Friday, and against al Qaeda.

He also criticized the U.N. Security Council, saying it was led by countries that plotted "evil" against others.

Violence has been spreading across Yemen since last year when the Iran-allied Houthis seized Sanaa and advanced into Sunni Muslim areas, leading to clashes with local tribes and al Qaeda and energizing a southern separatist movement.

Houthi did not elaborate on his criticism of the Council. But diplomats in New York said the council would on Sunday condemn the takeover of much of Yemen and its institutions by the Houthis and warn of "further measures" if hostilities do not end.

In combative remarks, Houthi said his foes had encouraged militant violence and used political reform talks to buy time, something he said would eventually transfer "the Libyan example to Yemen ... This has become more apparent and clear than ever."

"Al Qaeda and Daesh (Islamic State) do not have any compassion towards any party, and what's happening in Iraq and Syria today is a lesson to our country."

(Reuters)(Reporting by Sami Aboudi and Amena Bakr, Writing by William Maclean)

U.N. says Libya talks extended despite clashes

(GNN) - Libyan peace talks in Morocco between two rival governments, expected to end on Sunday, will be extended for two more days despite clashes on the ground.

Western leaders say the U.N. talks are the only way to end the chaos in Libya, where the two rival governments and armed factions are battling for control and Islamist militants have gained ground in the resulting mayhem.

A renewed military offensive in Libya's capital, Tripoli, had threatened international efforts to reach agreement on a unity government and lasting ceasefire in the warring oil producing state.

Both sides have attacked each other with war planes in the past few days. But earlier on Friday, U.N. special envoy Bernardino Leon had said he hoped the rival factions would soon come closer to reaching a deal.

Despite international pressure for a ceasefire to give a chance to peace talks, the internationally recognized government, which has withdrawn from the capital, said on Friday its troops had started a campaign to "liberate" Tripoli from the rival administration in control there.

"For the moment no one is leaving, we have had a difficult moment... after these attacks there was a possibility either to cancel the dialogue or to lose some of the delegations," Leon told reporters in the Moroccan costal town of Skhirat.

"The documents, which we have been have been discussing the last three days, might be ready tomorrow or the day after tomorrow," he said.

Leon said negotiations on candidates to be part of a unity government will come in a second stage of talks, which would start after a preliminary deal is reached in the next two days.

Diplomats say they accept that moderates attending the talks from both sides will face difficulty in persuading hardliners to accept any deal.

Four years after an uprising ousted Muammar Gaddafi, western powers fear Libya's conflict will spill into a broader civil war. Former rebel groups who once fought together against Gaddafi have turned against one another in a scramble for power.

(Reuters)(Reporting By Aziz El Yaakoubi; Editing by Patrick Markey and Peter Graff)

U.N. Security Council condemns Houthi actions in Yemen, threatens further measures

(GNN) - The United Nations Security Council will on Sunday condemn the takeover of much of Yemen and its institutions by the Shi'ite Muslim Houthi militia and warn of "further measures" if hostilities do not end, diplomats said.

In a statement that will be formally adopted at a meeting on Yemen later on Sunday, the 15-member body also stated its support for Yemen's President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, the diplomats said on condition of anonymity.

Yemen has been hurtling towards civil war since last year when the Iran-allied Houthis seized Sanaa and advanced into Sunni Muslim areas, leading to clashes with local tribes and energizing a southern separatist movement.

Earlier on Sunday, Houthis took over the central city of Taiz in an escalation of a power struggle diplomats say risks drawing in neighboring oil giant Saudi Arabia and its main regional rival Iran.

Their advance comes a day after nearly 140 worshippers died in suicide bombings of two mosques in Sanaa that are used by the Houthis. The attacks were claimed by Islamic State.

The Security Council "condemns the ongoing unilateral actions taken by the Houthis, which undermine the political transition process in Yemen, and jeopardize the security, stability, sovereignty and unity of Yemen," the statement will say, according to the diplomats.

The council will urge "non-state actors to withdraw from government institutions, including in the south of Yemen, and to refrain from any attempt to take over such institutions."

The statement also threatens "to take further measures against any party" to the conflict in Yemen. In November, the council imposed sanctions on Yemen's former president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, and two Houthi leaders.

Hadi, who operates from the southern port city of Aden since fleeing Houthi house arrest in Sanaa, has asked the Security Council for urgent help "in all available means to stop this aggression."

U.N. mediator Jamal Benomar is likely to brief the council later on Sunday via video link and the ambassadors of Yemen and Qatar, as chair of the Gulf Cooperation Council that comprises Gulf Arab states, will also speak, diplomats said

Yemen is home to Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, one of the global network's most active arms, which has carried out attacks abroad.

The Security Council expressed concern that al Qaeda could benefit from the deterioration of the political and security situation in Yemen.

(Reuters)(Reporting by Michelle Nichols; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)

Israel reaches out to France before resumption of Iran nuclear talks

(GNN) - Top Israeli envoys were sent to confer with French officials on Sunday about preventing what Israel considers an unfavorable nuclear deal with Iran after tensions surfaced between France and the United States ‎over negotiation strategy.

Though France has demanded more stringent restrictions than other Western delegations during talks with Iran, one French diplomat played down Israel's sway in Paris, saying that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had overplayed his hand in a March 3 speech to the U.S. Congress.

France, the United States and four other world powers suspended negotiations with Iran in Switzerland on Friday and are to reconvene next week to try to break the deadlock over sensitive atomic research and lifting of sanctions before a March 31 deadline for a framework deal.

Israel's Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz, however, told Israel Radio that he is flying to Paris at short notice and may also hold meetings with other European nations to re-state his country's concerns.

"This is an effort to prevent a (nuclear) deal that is bad and full of loopholes, or at least ... to succeed in closing or amending some of these loopholes," said Steinitz, who is being accompanied by Israeli National Security Adviser Joseph Cohen.

Officials in Israel, which is not a party to the negotiations but feels especially threatened by the possibility of a nuclear-armed Iran, have long described France as the negotiating power with views closest to Israel's.

Steinitz credited France with including curbs on Iran's mid-level enrichment of uranium to 20 percent fissile purity in the preliminary nuclear deal agreed in November 2013. “The French helped us a great deal," he said.

FRAYED TIES

At one point during the latest negotiations French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius phoned his team to ensure that it made no more concessions, officials at the talks said last week. And on Saturday Fabius said France wants an agreement that would guarantee that Iran could not produce a nuclear weapon.

Iran, meanwhile, says that its nuclear program is for peaceful needs only.

Israel's ties to its main ally, the United States, have frayed over Netanyahu's lobbying against the prospective Iran deal. Many of U.S. President Barack Obama's fellow Democrats boycotted Netanyahu's March 3 speech in Congress, which had been arranged by Republicans.

One senior French diplomat said that Netanyahu's speech, in which he reiterated his demand for a total rollback of Iranian nuclear technologies, had diminished Israel's clout. Paris is also unhappy with long-stalled Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking.

"Israel has marginalized itself. In November 2013 we were working with them and they played the game. They didn't take unrealistic positions," the diplomat told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

"But here they have gone too far. We told them to play their part so they could influence a final accord, but they have taken unrealistic positions."

U.S. officials have privately bristled at France’s outspoken criticism of the negotiating process and its demands for more stringent restrictions on Iran. Officials have expressed concerns that France might block a deal at the United Nations.

France's envoy to Washington, Gerard Araud, has been particularly vocal, tweeting that the setting of a March 31 deadline for a framework deal was "a bad tactic" and "counterproductive".

The target date for a full agreement is June 30 and European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini has played down the importance of the end-of-March deadline, saying that the priority is to seal a comprehensive deal by July.

(Reuters)(Editing by David Goodman)

Petrobras scandal prosecutors seek tougher anti-corruption laws

(GNN) - Prosecutors who uncovered Brazil's biggest corruption case called on Friday for tougher prison sentences and more legal powers to crack down on rampant graft that costs taxpayers more than the annual budget for education and health.

Hoping to ride a wave of national disgust over the latest corruption scandal at state-run oil company Petrobras, the top federal prosecutor's office known as PGR sent Congress proposals to stiffen penalties for corruption to up to 25 years in prison.

The prosecutors are seeking legal reforms to speed up the arrest of corruption suspects and seizure of their assets before they can be hidden. They also proposed reducing Brazil's long appeals process that often lets criminals go scot-free.

A multibillion-dollar kickback scheme uncovered at Petroleo Brasileiro SA has shaken President Dilma Rousseff's government and threatens to further slow a stagnant economy.

The investigation dubbed "Operation Car Wash" has led to the indictment of scores of executives from Brazil's top builders. It has implicated 47 politicians who allegedly received graft money, all but one of them from Rousseff's governing coalition.

"The Car Wash case has angered Brazil but it has not reduced corruption or impunity in the country," said the lead prosecutor in the probe, Deltan Dallagnol. He said the proposals could transform the anger into changes needed to fight corruption.

According to an estimate by the United Nations Development Program, graft amounts to 200 billion reais ($62 billion) a year in Brazil, or twice the 2014 health budget and 2-1/2 times the education budget.

The Petrobras scandal and economic downturn led to protests by about 1 million people across Brazilian cities on Sunday.

The PGR's anti-corruption wish list came two days after Rousseff made her own steps to counter rising discontent over the Petrobras scandal that has undermined her popularity and put her Workers' Party and its allies on the spot.

Both sets of measures call for the criminalization of off-the-books slush funds - known in Portuguese as "Caixa 2" - that are widely used by political parties to finance campaigns.

But the PGR plan goes further, proposing that political parties be held responsible and penalized by exclusion from elections if their members are found guilty of corruption.

On Monday, Dallagnol and his team of prosecutors charged the treasurer of the ruling Workers' Party with corruption for soliciting donations from executives accused of funneling money from Petrobras contracts to politicians.

($1=3.22 reais)

(Reuters)(Editing by Richard Chang)

At least 15 kidnapped by unknown gunmen in eastern Cameroon

(GNN) - At least 15 people, including a mayor and local government officials, were kidnapped by unknown gunmen in eastern Cameroon near the restive border region with Central African Republic, authorities said on Friday.

The delegation, which included local councillors, was returning from a funeral on Thursday night when they were attacked near Garoua-Boulai, about 600 km (373 miles) northeast of the capital Yaounde.

Samuel Ivaha Diboua, governor of Cameroon's Eastern Region, said in a statement that everything was being done to free the hostages.

The victims were taken across the border into Central African Republic, one of the three members of the delegation to escape told officials.


Armed rebel groups from Central African Republic have carried out similar types of raids since their country descended into chaos in March 2013 after the Seleka rebel group seized power.

(Reuters)(Reporting by Anne Mireille Nzouankeu and David Wanedam; Writing by Bate Felix; Editing by Daniel Flynn)

Netanyahu row casts doubt on Obama pledge to 'have Israel's back'

(GNN) - U.S. President Barack Obama, who once famously said he would “always have Israel’s back,” may be rethinking that promise as aides begin weighing options in response to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s pre-election disavowal of a two-state solution to the Middle East conflict.

Following Obama’s warning that the United States would “reassess” its relationship with Israel, the administration is not only reconsidering the diplomatic cover it has long given Israel at the United Nations but is also looking at a range of other possibilities to put pressure on its historically close ally, U.S. officials said.

Those could include becoming less active in protecting Israel in international forums and finding new ways to reinforce the message of U.S. opposition to Jewish settlement expansion.

As internal discussions proceeded on Friday, the White House appeared in no rush to lower the temperature in the worst U.S.-Israeli crisis in decades, sparked by Netanyahu’s campaign declaration that there would be no Palestinian state on his watch.

The White House made clear for a second straight day that it had little faith in Netanyahu’s effort to backtrack since winning Tuesday's election and insist he was in favor of a two-state solution, long a cornerstone of U.S. Middle East policy.

There was no sign of any imminent move to turn the administration’s heated rhetoric against Netanyahu into a tangible shift in policy.

As a result, some analysts questioned whether Washington was merely posturing to put the Israeli leader on the defensive at a time when an end-of-March deadline looms in U.S.-led nuclear diplomacy with Iran that Netanyahu vehemently opposes.

“The administration is putting everything on the table except security assistance – and this will allow Netanyahu time to walk back his comments more credibly,” said Daniel Kurtzer, former U.S. ambassador to Israel. “I would also not expect any decisions before the situation with respect to the Iran negotiations becomes clearer.”

U.S. officials privately were mindful of the risk that the diplomatic storm could drive a deeper wedge between the administration and the influential U.S. pro-Israel camp and cause problems for Obama’s fellow Democrats as the 2016 presidential campaign approaches.

One U.S. official voiced skepticism that the administration would shift its stance toward Israel in any substantive way, arguing that despite White House annoyance at Netanyahu, there would likely be too high a domestic political cost to pay for alienating pro-Israel Americans.

“I just don’t believe in the reassessment,” said this official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of U.S. relations with Israel.

But Dennis Ross, Obama’s former top Middle East adviser, said the White House pressure had other motives as well.

“There’s an effort to apply leverage to the Israelis to get the prime minister to move on some things when he has a new government formed,” Ross said, citing a U.S. wish to see Israel release frozen Palestinian tax funds and take other goodwill gestures.

RECONSIDERING U.S. SHIELD AT UN

Among the most serious risks for Israel would be a shift in Washington’s posture at the United Nations.

The United States has long stood in the way of Palestinian efforts to get a U.N. resolution recognizing its statehood, including threatening to use its veto, and has protected Israel from efforts to isolate it internationally. But European governments incensed by Netanyahu’s campaign comments against Palestinian statehood, could join in another push for such a resolution.

David Makovsky, a former member of Obama’s team in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks that collapsed last year, said the question is: “Will the U.S. consider avoiding a veto over the parameters to a final-status deal with the Palestinians?”

“There’s no doubt that this approach will lead to a firestorm between these two governments if they go forward,” said Makovsky, now at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Another option under consideration cited by a U.S. official could also be controversial. A report from the administration to Congress in coming weeks about U.S. loan guarantees to Israel, including how much is used for settlements, could contain language critical of expanded construction on occupied land in the West Bank.

While the United States is not likely to reverse its opposition to the Palestinians joining the International Criminal Court next month, Washington could become less vocal in criticizing the move. Some U.S. lawmakers already have threatened to push for a cutoff of U.S. aid to the Palestinian Authority if it goes ahead with its threat to seek war crimes charges against Israel for last year’s war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

Other possibilities include Obama's cutting back on future one-on-one encounters with Netanyahu.

White House officials have left little doubt that Netanyahu's U.S. ambassador, Ron Dermer, has been largely frozen out by parts of the administration for his role in orchestrating Netanyahu’s speech to Congress this month against Obama’s Iran diplomacy.

(Reuters)(Additional reporting by Arshad Mohammed; Editing by Howard Goller)

Deadlocked Iran nuclear talks break off, to resume next week

(GNN) - Iran and six world powers suspended negotiations on a nuclear agreement and were set to meet again next week to break a deadlock over sensitive atomic research and lifting of sanctions, Western officials said on Friday.

While the talks have made progress over the past year, differences on sticking points are still wide enough to potentially prevent an agreement in the end.

France was demanding more stringent restrictions on the Iranians under any deal than the other Western delegations, officials said.


A European negotiator said the six power group - the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China - was generally unified but voiced concern that the Obama administration was under pressure due to concerns Republican-led Congress might wreck any agreement.

"The great ‎paradox is that Congress and Israel have put the pressure on the Americans instead of pressuring Iran which is what we need to be doing," the official said.

Iran's delegation told the six powers it was returning to Tehran due to the death of President Hassan Rouhani's 90-year-old mother on Friday.

Prior to the Iranian departure, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and Iranian Atomic Energy Organisation chief Ali Akbar Salehi held another series of meetings to break the impasse.

Technical and political experts have also gathered daily to discuss options that could form the basis of an agreement under which Iran would accept curbs on sensitive nuclear work for at least a decade and sanctions on it would be gradually eased.

There was no breakthrough this week. Disagreements arose among the powers, with France insisting on a longer period of restrictions on Iran's nuclear work. It also opposed the idea of suspending some U.N. sanctions relatively quickly if a deal is struck.

Iran, which denies allegations from the Western powers and their allies that it harbors nuclear weapons ambitions, wants all U.N. sanctions to be lifted immediately, including those targeting its nuclear program.

"They insist they have to go immediately. No way. It is out the question," said a senior European negotiator.

Zarif said the talks had reached a "very crucial point" and progress had been made this week. He also suggested the six powers needed to reach a unified position.

"Given that Americans had officially said that further internal coordination meetings needed among the (six) members, the talks were ended and will resume next week in Lausanne," Iran's ISNA news agency quoted Zarif as saying.

Kerry said they made good progress, adding: "We'll be back next week." Russia's chief negotiator Sergei Ryabkov told Reuters he agreed wholeheartedly with Kerry's assessment.

During that meeting, Kerry expressed condolences to the delegation for the passing of Rouhani's mother and greetings for the Iranian new year holiday Norouz, which begins on Saturday.

U.S. President Barack Obama prepared a video message to Iran's people and leaders on Thursday, saying this year represented the "best opportunity in decades" to improve ties between their two countries. But differences in the nuclear talks remained, he said.

Western and Iranian officials have said that the sides are very far apart, though all delegations want a deal.

POLITICAL FRAMEWORK

The Europeans and Kerry plan to meet in London on Saturday before the end-March deadline for a political framework agreement and a full nuclear deal by June 30.

Not all members of the six power group believe March 31 is an important deadline.

"For us the deadline is June 30," the senior European official said.

The London meeting is intended to bridge differences among the Americans and Europeans, negotiators said. Officials have expressed concerns that the French might block a deal.

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini denied there were divisions between Europe and the United States.

"There is unity, there is unity on the fact that we want a deal, we want a good deal," she said in Brussels after talks with French President Francois Hollande, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and British Prime Minister David Cameron.

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said the talks would resume on Wednesday.

This week's re-election of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, a fierce opponent of engagement with Iran and critic of a possible nuclear deal, made clear that the pressure on the United States would not let up.

Pressure from the U.S. Congress is also driving the pace of negotiations. Obama bought some time on Thursday after U.S. Senate Democrats and Republicans agreed to delay until April 14 the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's vote on legislation that would force Obama to submit any agreement with Iran for Congress' approval.

Obama has said a nuclear deal does not need Congressional approval and said he would veto any proposals for new U.S. sanctions.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told Kerry the talks "must not fall short for lack of a final effort", China's Foreign Ministry said after the two spoke on the telephone.

The biggest sticking point, Western officials said, remains Iran's demands to have no limits on research and development of advanced centrifuges, machines that purify uranium for use in nuclear reactors or, if very highly enriched, in weapons.

Another is the lifting of sanctions. Iran wants all United Nations sanctions and the most crippling U.S. and European Union restrictions on Tehran's energy and financial sectors lifted immediately after a deal is agreed.

A further area of disagreement is the duration of a deal. Obama has said restrictions on Iranian nuclear work should be in place for at least 10 years. U.S. negotiators are pushing to make it longer than that, while France wants it to last for at least 15 years with another decade of intense U.N. monitoring of Iranian nuclear sites.

There are a few areas of tentative agreement, including that Iran could operation around 6,000 early generation centrifuges. But officials close to the talks dismissed reports of a tentative deal, saying they were very far from circulating anything remotely resembling a draft accord.

(Reuters)(Additional reporting by John Irish and Lesley Wroughton; Writing by Louis Charbonneau and Parisa Hafezi; Editing by Giles Elgood)

'Business as usual' will create a thirsty planet in 15 years, says U.N.

LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - The planet faces a 40 percent shortfall in water supplies in 15 years due to urbanization, population growth and increasing demand for water for food production, energy and industry, the United Nations said on Friday.

Competition for water between water-thirsty sectors means better management is essential to ensure everybody gets the water they need, said the World Water Development Report.

With "business as usual" the world is facing a "collapse in our global socioeconomic system," Richard Connor, lead author of the report, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

By 2050 two thirds of the world's population will be living in cities and demand for water is expected to increase by 55 percent, mainly from demands related to growing urbanization in developing countries.

Urbanization means that access to safe water and adequate sanitation, although typically higher in cities, has decreased in the fastest growing urban areas.

One example is sub-Saharan Africa, where urbanization - often unplanned - is happening most rapidly. Here the proportion of people who have piped water on their premises has fallen to 34 percent from 42 percent since 1990.

"The spontaneous urbanization, which creates slums, makes it very difficult because of the layout of the slums to provide water," Joan Clos, executive director of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in a phone interview from Nairobi.

"Once you have a street then for the water operator it becomes very easy to reach the plots."

MORE PEOPLE, MORE FOOD

By 2050 the world will have to produce 60 percent more food and the global water demand for industry is predicted to increase by 400 percent, said the report, published ahead of World Water Day on March 22.

The growing population will also need 70 percent more energy and water is required to produce almost all forms of it.

"You have to manage water. If you're using less water because of your proper irrigation and soil management in agriculture that allows more water to be available for other users," Connor said.

"Every sector has to pitch in and do its best to be water efficient."

Investing in sustainable water management, although costly, pays off: a $15 to 30 billion invested in improved water resources management in developing countries can have an annual income return of $60 billion, the report said.

"Over the long term investing in water and sanitation is cost-effective. That is the convincing argument that it's not just to help the poor, it's actually good business," said Connor.

Cities with long-term water plans will have more robust economies within decades, he said, because people who have access to clean water are healthier and have a better chance of getting educated and finding jobs.

(Reporting by Magdalena Mis; Editing by Ros Russell)

Violence against women rises in Ebola-hit nations: ministers

UNITED NATIONS (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - The Ebola epidemic in West Africa exacerbated violence against women and rolled back access to reproductive healthcare in the region, ministers from Guinea and Liberia said on Wednesday.


In Guinea, data indicates a 4.5 percent increase in cases of gender-based violence since before the epidemic including twice as many rapes, Sanaba Kaba, the country's minister of social action, women and children, said on a panel at the United Nations 59th Commission on the Status of Women.

Liberia also saw more cases of gender-based violence as a result of the outbreak, said Julia Duncan Cassell, minister of gender and development in that country.

She said some men were not respecting the recovery protocol that Ebola survivors should observe and were infecting their spouses and female partners through unprotected sex.

Sierra Leone also has seen an increase in violence against women, said panel moderator Awa Ndiaye Seck, Liberian country representative for UN Women, the agency responsible for gender equality and women's empowerment.

The death toll from West Africa's Ebola outbreak has passed 10,000, according to the latest tally released by the World Health Organization.

Guinea has suffered a setback in its fight against Ebola with a rash of new cases, while Liberia released its last patient earlier this month.

The deadly virus has put a considerable strain on reproductive health services, which are still recovering, and chipping away at health gains made before the epidemic, the ministers said.

Kaba of Guinea said that during the outbreak there was a significant drop in the number of women seeking prenatal consultations and a 7 percent to 10 percent decrease in those seeking delivery of their babies - all of which are provided free of charge in Guinea.

As Ebola raged in the region, people turned away from health clinics that they saw as places of possible infection.

At times, pregnant women who were courageous enough to go to a clinic would find that healthcare workers had fled for fear of infection, experts said.

Deliveries usually involve a large amount of bodily fluids, through which the deadly virus spreads.

WOMEN BEAR BRUNT OF EBOLA

Women have been more affected by the deadly virus than men, with an infection rate of 56 percent compared to 44 percent for men, said Ndiaye Seck of UN Women.

This is largely due to the fact that many of the health workers providing care for Ebola victims are female, and women are also most likely to look after sick relatives at home, according to the United Nation's Children Fund (UNICEF).

Women accounted for 40 percent of the total Ebola death toll in Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone, the three most directly affected nations, said Duncan Cassell of Liberia.

Another devastating effect of the epidemic was the economic disruption it caused, the ministers said.

The economic impact of the disease on women, who are the majority of smallholder farmers, was greatest in rural areas. There was a dramatic drop in food production due to death and sickness among farmworkers or their fear of leaving home to tend fields.

(Reporting by Maria Caspani, Editing by Lisa Anderson)

South Sudan warlord offers abducted boys sit exams: U.N. envoy

(GNN) - A South Sudanese warlord who abducted about 89 boys from their school has offered to let them return to finish exams as long as they are then given back to him to fight, United Nations global education envoy Gordon Brown said on Wednesday.


"The whole world should be protesting as we did over Chibok about any child that is abducted from their school and any child that has been kidnapped ... as is happening to so many children in South Sudan," Brown told reporters at the United Nations.

Brown was referring to the kidnap of more than 200 girls by Boko Haram militants from Chibok, Nigeria. Boko Haram, which is fighting to carve an Islamic state in northeast Nigeria, attacked the girls' secondary school almost a year ago at exam time. The abduction led to a global campaign to find them.

In South Sudan, the U.N. Children's Fund UNICEF said in February that gunmen kidnapped the boys in oil-rich Upper Nile State while they were sitting exams.

Brown, a former British prime minister, said they were aged between 12 and 15. Brown was starting a campaign for the world to guard schools from military use and attacks and give them the same protections as Red Cross hospitals.

"The latest information is that the terrorist group has offered to allow them to sit their exams as long as they can then take them back as child soldiers," Brown said. He did not give details on who had taken the boys.

Brown said there have been more than 10,000 attacks on schools worldwide in the past five years and 28 million children in areas of conflict or emergency are unable to attend school.

South Sudan declared independence from Sudan in 2011. In January, the United Nations secured the release of about 3,000 child soldiers.

"About 12,000 children in South Sudan have been abducted in recent times by different factions ... who are training these children who have been abducted as soldiers for the future," Brown said.

South Sudan plunged into civil war in December 2013 when a political crisis sparked fighting between forces loyal to President Salva Kiir and rebels allied with his former deputy Riek Machar. The conflict has reopened ethnic fault lines that pit Kiir's Dinka people against Machar's ethnic Nuer forces.

At least 10,000 people have been killed and 1.5 million civilians displaced. On Tuesday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Samantha Power, said a lack of accountability for atrocities hinders a bid for peace.

(Reuters)(Reporting by Michelle Nichols; Editing by Grant McCool)

Mali government refuses further talks on north's future

(GNN) - Mali's government said on Wednesday it would not participate in further talks with rebels seeking autonomy for northern Mali, leaving the future of a U.N.-brokered peace process in question.

A collapse in peace talks could leave the question of north Mali's political status open indefinitely, a factor that may be exploited by Islamist militants active in the region.

Mediators have been working for months to facilitate talks between a group of Tuareg-led rebels from the north and the southern government in Bamako aimed at ending decades of northern uprisings.


Bamako signed a preliminary proposal in early March but the rebels rejected it this week, saying it did not grant enough autonomy for a region they call Azawad.

"There is no question for us to resume negotiations again, otherwise it will never end," government spokesman Choguel Kokala Maiga told reporters.

The government refusal to reopen discussions comes a day after the rebel coalition known as the Coordination of Azawad Movements (CMA) agreed to another round of talks, without setting a date or location.

Mediators from the United Nations, the African Union, France, China, Russia and Algeria had flown to the rebel stronghold town of Kidal in an attempt to salvage the peace process.

The United Nations said in a statement that the CMA had submitted a document in the Tuesday meeting with a list of "observations it would like the mediators to consider in order to proceed with a signature."

It did not give details of the demands.

"Certain of these observations formulated by the CMA could be validly taken into account in the framework of the implementation of the agreement," the U.N. added.

(Reuters)(Reporting by Tiemoko Diallo; Additional reporting by David Lewis; Writing by Emma Farge; Editing by Tom Heneghan)