Showing posts with label Mutual Fund Center. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mutual Fund Center. Show all posts

Allianz in $700 mln deal with Goldman to hedge CPIC stake-terms

(GNN) - German insurer Allianz has struck a $700 million deal with Goldman Sachs to protect most of its stake in China Pacific Insurance Group Co Ltd (CPIC), according to a term sheet of the deal seen by Reuters.

Goldman Sachs sold 147.7 million Hong Kong traded shares of CPIC at a price of HK$36.77 each to hedge an equal position of Allianz in the Chinese insurer, the terms showed. That's equivalent to about 60 percent of the Allianz stake in CPIC.

Goldman acted as sole bookrunner for the transaction.

(Reuters)(Reporting by Fiona Lau of IFR and Elzio Barreto; Editing by Miral Fahmy)

Market Chatter- Corporate finance press digest

#GNN - The following corporate finance-related stories were reported by media:

* Italy's UniCredit is close to selling a new portion of its private equity holdings after a similar deal in 2013, a source close to the matter said on Sunday, as European banks shed non-core assets to strengthen their capital base.

* A deal to resolve a U.S. regulator's claims against Goldman Sachs Group Inc over mortgage-backed securities sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac leading up to the financial crisis could cost the bank between $800 million and $1.25 billion, according to a person familiar with the matter.

* The new management of Italy's Eni plans to press on with the sale of a controlling stake in oil services subsidiary Saipem so it can focus on the more lucrative business of finding oil and gas, sources said.

* Exxon Mobil Corp is considering a multibillion-dollar plan to expand its Beaumont, Texas, refinery into the country's largest, the first major refining investment of the U.S. shale oil boom, people with knowledge of the deliberations said.

* Sweden's Nordic Capital is considering listing Thule, a maker of car roof storage boxes, on the Stockholm stock market this year and has picked Goldman Sachs and Nordea to lead the offering, three people familiar with the matter said.

* Philips has taken a first step towards selling a stake in a lighting components business it is currently carving out by appointing Morgan Stanley to handle the sale process, three people familiar with the matter said.

For the deals of the day click on

For the Morning News Call-EMEA newsletter click on (GNN,Reuters,AIP)(Compiled by Abhiram Nandakumar in Bangalore)

Citi, U.S. $7 billion settlement announcement expected Monday

(GNN) - Citigroup agreed to pay $7 billion to resolve a U.S. government investigation into shoddy mortgage-backed securities the bank sold in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis in a settlement set to be announced on Monday, sources said.

The $7 billion includes $4 billion in cash to the U.S. Department of Justice, $2.5 billion in consumer relief, more than $200 million to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and just under $300 million to settle probes by five states, said sources familiar with the negotiations.

Spokespeople for the Justice Department and the bank declined comment. Representatives of attorneys general of New York, Delaware, California, Massachusetts and Illinois, the states said to be involved, did not immediately return requests for comment. Nor did the FDIC.

The settlement, signed over the weekend, caps months of negotiations, during which the government demanded $12 billion and threatened to sue Citigroup, according to the sources.

The deal is scheduled to be announced on Monday morning when Citigroup executives also will report second-quarter results before the stock market opens in New York, the sources said.

The $7 billion has surprised stock analysts and people inside the bank, who expected Citigroup to resolve the investigations for much less.

Citigroup is the second major bank to settle with authorities since President Barack Obama ordered the formation of a task force to investigate the sale and packaging of toxic home loans, which were at the center of the 2008 financial crisis. The Justice Department issued more than a dozen subpoenas to financial institutions in early 2012.

Bank of America Corp also has been negotiating with the Justice Department over similar claims.

JPMorgan Chase & Co, the largest U.S. bank, last year agreed to pay $13 billion to settle government probes over the packaging of toxic mortgages, including by Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual, which the bank acquired during the crisis.

The $13 billion JPMorgan accord was comprised of a $2 billion penalty to the Justice Department, $4 billion in consumer relief, $4 billion to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and $3 billion to other authorities.

Citigroup's penalty to the Justice Department is twice what JPMorgan paid, though it had handled far fewer mortgage-backed securities, because investigators found more evidence of defective loans in the bank's securities and more awareness of the wrongdoing at the time, the sources said.

At the same time, the Citigroup settlement covers the bank's potential exposure for tens of billions of dollars' worth of collateralized debt obligations, the sources said. JPMorgan got no such release in its deal.

LONG NEGOTIATIONS

Negotiations with Citigroup, the third largest U.S. bank, began with a meeting in Brooklyn in November, the day the JPMorgan settlement was announced, one source said.

In late April, the bank offered $363 million, the sources said. At a May 2 meeting in Washington, the government demanded the bank increase its offer, sources said, and Citi responded with $700 million.

Justice did not consider the offer realistic, according to sources. Citi then came up with $1 billion in cash and $2 billion in consumer relief, one source said.

But by then, Justice made a demand of $12 billion, sources said.

Negotiations reached a fevered pitch the week of June 9, with Citigroup requesting to meet with U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder several times that week, only to be rebuffed, one source said.

The Department of Justice gave Citigroup until June 13 to come back with a serious offer. By that Sunday, Citigroup agreed to pay $3.6 billion in cash, $2.5 billion in consumer relief and $900 million more to cover probes by five states and the FDIC, one source said.

The department threatened to sue Citigroup, but on June 17 postponed a planned announcement, sources said.

Top Justice Department officials were preoccupied with the capture of a suspect in the 2012 attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi, Libya, and other commitments, sources said.

The bank then worked on the consumer relief portion and Tony West, the No. 3 Justice Department official, negotiated for Citi to settle with the states and FDIC for $500 million, rather than $900 million, one source said.

The $400 million difference was moved into the Justice Department's bucket, where it was no longer tax deductible as a business expense, the source said.

IMPACT ON RESULTS
How much the deal will reduce Citigroup's quarterly results on Monday depends on various factors.

Citigroup has not disclosed how much of the legal cost it has already incurred by booking reserves. Analysts have estimated its legal reserves at between $2 billion and $3.5 billion.

Citigroup said in May that possible litigation losses in excess of its reserves could be as much as $5 billion.

Analysts, on average, have expected Citigroup to report on Monday that it earned $1.09 a share in the second-quarter, down nearly 13 percent from a year earlier, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters. It's not clear whether the estimates had been updated to include the expected settlement. (Reuters)(AIP)(Reporting by Karen Freifeld in New York and Aruna Viswanatha in Washington; Additional reporting by David Henry in New York; Editing by Frances Kerry and Sandra Maler)

Goldman to test appetite for new structured product

LONDON, June 23 (IFR) - Goldman Sachs will start marketing a new type of bond transaction this Wednesday that straddles asset categories and features an unusual triple-recourse structure, as it seeks to take advantage of investors' demand for Triple A rated assets.

The so-called Fixed Income Global Structure Collateral Obligation (FIGSCO) issuer is a joint venture between Goldman Sachs and Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance and will provide investors with a triple recourse if things turn sour.

Under the structure, investors will have recourse to the pool of assets backing the trade, as well as having an unsecured claim against Goldman Sachs and Mitsui.

This triple-recourse mechanism makes the transaction akin to a covered bond issue, where investors have a claim against the assets and the issuer and, indeed, covered bond investors will be among the targeted roadshow audience.

The transaction is expected to diversify Goldman's funding sources and the outright pricing level is expected to be competitive with senior funding.

The deal has been structured in response to a lack of supply of Triple A rated assets and net negative covered bond supply. The programme size being set up is 10bn.

Barclays, Credit Agricole-CIB, Natixis, Goldman Sachs and UBS will hold investor meetings running from Wednesday until July 1.

But while the transaction uses some covered bond technology, it does not have all the bells and whistles traditionally attached to the sector.

There is no legal framework; the assets would not be eligible for a cover pool as defined by European regulation; the bonds will unlikely be repo-eligible at the ECB; nor will they likely count for the Liquidity Coverage Ratio. They will probably have a 20% risk-weighting and be treated as Triple A corporate exposure under Solvency 2.

TRIPLE A WITH A SPREAD

The deal could offer buyers a much more attractive spread than a sovereign trade, while filling a supply gap in the covered bond primary market, according to a FIG syndicate banker.

"This is an interesting trade, especially if you look at what's going on in the world," he said. "This will offer value and we expect the big liquidity books to get on board." On the negative side, the deal may require more knowledge than a plain Triple A trade.

"We have been here before: Triple A with a spread," the banker said, "which is why the roadshow will be extremely important and investors will have to do their homework."

Another banker said the complex nature of the trade was a negative. "They clearly want to leverage the success of covered bonds, but the complexity alone is negative."

The S&P Triple A is achieved thanks to a total return swap provided on it by Goldman Sachs Mitsui Marine Derivative Products, or GS MMDP, a joint venture with strong credit ratings. For some, this has echoes of the much maligned CDO market.

Meanwhile, the deal's collateral cashflow is likely to come from a variety of securities from Goldman Sach's long-term funding operations.

There is no disclosure yet, but that could mean the collateral could include bonds, derivatives and loan assets, which sources away from the deal say resembles something between a structured covered bond and a CDO structure.

FIGSCO would be more dynamic than a typical covered bond pool, though, as assets would be marked to bid on a daily basis and topped up to keep overcollateralisation above 5%.

More collateral will be added to the pool if the existing securities decline in value. A reputable international asset monitor will be tasked with assessing the valuation of the pool on a monthly basis.

The items would not be disclosed line by line, but investors would be informed of the type of assets, the country of origin, the proportion of fixed and FRN assets and the level of concentration risk.

(Reporting By Helene Durand, Anna Brunetti, Editing by Philip Wright)